案發時間：2008(民國97)年6月18日 星期三
案發地點：某國中某年級某班級教室
過程描述：
帶著「......教育部......第十四次.....問卷調查」的學校老師，在早自修大家正努力的寫著自然考卷時，闖了進來。
「抱歉，這裡有一份問卷要你們填.....」
(同學們心想)：煩死了，我寫考卷寫到一半啦，有問卷就快發啦，別拖拖拉拉。
老師開始把問卷一排一排發下來，等所有同學拿到之後──
「拿到考卷後請在左上角的欄位寫下學校名稱以及姓名」
(同學們心 想)：這什麼問卷呀，偷喵一下吧...好像是關於校園霸凌的...
「請在所有的空格填選項『1』，第五、第六題空著」
(同學們心想)：什麼！我有聽錯嗎？這問卷不是說要照實回答？管他，我就照實回答吧！
過了許久，大家終於寫完了，收完問卷後，老師有些難為情的翻著問卷(他好像還撥了手機)
之後，學務處的身教組長，也就是在xx國中身材最魁梧，走起路來搖搖擺擺、帶著一個鴨舌帽的那個──。他，闖了進來。
組長馬上走到問卷老師面前，翻了翻問卷，之後，較叫好幾位同學領回問卷，並改成「正確的」
這中間，組長還對學生飆了一句話
「你有被打過嗎？幹嘛亂填，這樣對你有好處嗎？」「你幹嘛不說話？！」
然後，問卷老師和組長...應該可以說是...逃之夭夭了！
同學們開始議論紛紛：看你那個搶匪的樣子我說得出話嗎？你亂叫我填，那我亂填不行嗎？
「論」：
這是最近才發生的事
看完後，你大概會「唉！」 或 「那組長該打」 或是 「發生這種事也沒辦法呀」
事實上
如果仔細想
組長有組長的難處
而且我相信一定還有學校也會像我們組長那樣
畢竟
那是「記名名單」呀
但
這真的可以說是 重創我們國中生的滿腔抱負
在台灣的教育下 尤其是屏東這種鄉下地區 老師是多麼高高在上 多麼德高望重呀
他平常所說的一切 在想像中 多神聖呀
他卻犯下了讓學生目瞪口呆的錯
他這樣掩蔽事實
能解決嗎？
根本之道
不是他們老師常常在說的
面對問題所在一一破解
校長也說了呀 「共同來努力，創造和諧的校園」
組長可以說是為了怕被處罰
販賣了自己的人格
違背了校長
不過，當我們正想把組長痛宰一頓的時候
別問了一件事
理性的分析
假如
組長今天誠實的交了問卷
大家可能會發現
就只有屏東的這個xx國中的學生 受到霸凌
接著
大家就開始把箭往他對準
結果殺了一個人
到時候
他想努力改善校園霸凌的問題
也沒機會給他改善了
所以說
這解決之道就是
改善呀
事實卻是──既然他這樣一次又一次的掩蓋
都可以安全過關
那何樂而不為
所以他也懶得改善了
頂多處理比較嚴重的
其他任由自生自滅
再想想
除了組長以外還有誰的錯
就是那些官員
你們都已經是職位崇高的官員了
就該想想
這張問卷發下去給學校後
會發生什麼事
真的有效果嗎？
而你們這些官員
如果不想被說成是「為了不被立法委員砲轟下台，而做show印一堆問卷」
就應該好好想
理論上你們沒做錯事
但身為官員 你們可說是大錯特錯
剛剛談到立法委員
大家的印象應該是
「口才很好
把別人的缺點說得頭頭是道
還曾經在立法院東拉西扯」
當然不可能沒個立法委員都是這副德性
卻因為那幾個常常動不動就喊「下台」、「下台」、「下台」的大砲
搞壞了立法委員
下台有用嗎？
你只放大別人的錯 卻沒說到錯真正的原因 然後就開始叫別人下台
這樣有用？有用的話台灣就發了哩！
結果換了一個
也沒比較好吧
人是從失敗中學習
在專業的人的決定 也不一定對 不過「下台」這句話的壓力多大呀 反而壓得別人無法學習
別的不說，尤其是才剛上任就被砲轟
我看這樣只會白白損失人才
好的人，可以、但不一定能每次做出好的決定
一想到這裡
...真是氣人
連我們學生都不禁要問
「你們不是常常說『現在的學生是怎麼了，好難教呀』，那你麼..」
「那你麼這些老師又怎麼了？」
想一想，改說「那你麼這些官員又怎麼了？」
又改說「那你麼這些政治人物又怎麼了？」
最後，學生們的心聲沒有人知道，就算被少部分沒用的官員知道了，他又安撫你，因為他要做show
就算被立法委員知道了，他又開始砲轟別人下台
於是學生們只好喊
「台灣是怎麼了？」
以下是英文版，用翻譯軟體翻的，非常破(我實驗一下所以...)，很難理解= =
回手頁
Happening time: 2008 (Republic of China 97) year on June 18 Wednesday
Happening place: In some country some grade some class and grade classroom
Process description: She Is bringing “......Ministry of Education ......The 14th time .....Questionnaire survey” school teacher, studies independently everybody in the morning diligently to write time the natural examination paper, rushed. “the regret, here has a questionnaire to want you to fill in .....” (schoolmates to think): WE were tired, I wrote the examination paper to write about half, had the questionnaire quickly to send, do not haul. Teacher starts questionnaire one row of one row to send down, after and so on all schoolmates attain, after ── “attains the examination paper, please write down the school name as well as the name in the top left-hand corner column” (schoolmates thinks): This any questionnaire, steals meow…Probably is insults about the campus tyrant… “please do fill in the option in all blank spaces '1', the fifth, sixth topic empties” (schoolmates to think): Anything! I have misunderstand? This questionnaire was not said that must reply actually? Manages him, I actually replies! Crossed for a long time, everybody had finished finally, after receiving the questionnaire, after teacher somewhat embarrassed is turning the questionnaire (he has probably also dialed handset), studies the service place to teach by example group leader, is also in xx country the stature tallest and strongest, takes the road to swagger, to bring one duckbill cap that ──. He, rushed. Group leader arrives in front of immediately questionnaire teacher, flipped the questionnaire, afterward, is called several schoolmates to get back the questionnaire, and alters to among “correctly” this, group leader also “you had to student wind a few words has been hit? Does fills in randomly, like this has the advantage to you?”“you do speak?!” Then, questionnaire teacher and group leader…Should be possible to say is…Made a getaway! Schoolmates start to whoop: Looked that your bandit's appearance I can say the words? You kyoodle me to fill, then I fill in not good randomly?
“theory”: After this is only then occurred recently the matter which looks, your probably meeting “!” Or “that group leader should hit” perhaps “has this kind of matter also not to have the means” if in fact thought carefully group leader has group leader's difficulty moreover I to believe will have the school also to look like our group leader such after all that will certainly also be “records a name the name list”, but this really may say that was causes heavy losses to our country mesozoic aspiration filled with all which Bingdong this kind of countryside area teacher was particularly keeps aloof under Taiwan's education how he of noble character and high prestige usually to say to be sacred in the imagination he actually to violate has let the student dumbfounded be wrong his such concealed fact to be able to solve? The basic road was not their teacher is saying frequently in 11 explains principal facing the question also to say “came together diligently, created the harmonious campus” group leader to be possible saying that was to fear is punished trades own personality to violate principal However, when we wanted butchered painful group leader a time not to ask an affair's analysis, if group leader honest will hand over questionnaire everybody possibly to discover today on only then in Bingdong's this xx country students receives the tyrant to insult then everybody to start the arrow to aim toward him the result to kill a person when the time comes him to want to improve the question which the campus tyrant insulted also not to have diligently the opportunity for him to improve Therefore said that this solution is the improvement fact is actually ──, since he such cover time and time again may go through a strategic pass safely that therefore why not he was also disinclined to improve has processed quite serious other at most, whatever ran its own course Whose thinks after group leader also some wrong is again these officials you already was the position lofty official should think this questionnaire sends for the school what matter will have really will have the effect? But your these officials, if does not want to talk into is “, for is not mass-criticized by legislator leaves office, but made show to print pile of questionnaire” to want you not to make the wrong thing but body well for the official you to be possible theoretically saying that was completely mistaken Just talked about legislator everybody's impression to be “the eloquence is very good others' shortcoming says rationally also once talked at random in the Legislative Yuan” certainly is impossible not to have legislators was this vice-morality moral character because actually how many frequently often did shout that “left office”, “left office”, “leaves office” the cannon to cause to break down legislator to leave office usefully? You only enlarge others wrong actually not to speak of the wrong true reason then to start to be called others to leave office like this usefully? Useful words Taiwan sent! The result traded one also not to have is quite good the human is studies from the defeat in the specialized person's decision not necessarily to “leaves office” these words pressure to be much big instead presses others to be unable to study other did not say that particularly just now takes office is mass-criticized I to look in vain will like this only lose the talented person good person, might, as soon as but not necessarily could each time make the good decision to think of here…Is really exasperating links our students to be unable to restrain to ask that “you were not said frequently 'how present's student was, good difficult to teach', then you.” “that your these teachers how?” Thinks that changed says “how that your these officials?” Also changed says “how that your these political figure?” Finally, students' aspiration nobody knew, even if has been known by the few part useless official, he comforts you, because he wanted to make show to know by legislator, therefore he started to mass-criticize others to leave office the students to have to shout that “how Taiwan was?”
